DSN Learning about the Safety Train

DSN Chemical Transportation was at L.V. Lomas last week to learn about bulk rail transport of chemicals with the aid of the Safety Train hosted at L.V. Lomas’ site.  You can learn more about the Safety Train at the  CIAC website.  Big thanks goes out to LV Lomas and Canadian Association of Chemical Distributors for arranging the tour.

Posted in Chemical Transportation, Industry Information | Comments Off

New Definition of Tank Vehicle in the US Starting to Enter Enforcement Phase

On May 9, 2011 the FMCA expanded the definition of a Tank Vehicle to:

Tank vehicle means any commercial motor vehicle that is designed to transport any liquid or gaseous materials within a tank or tanks having an individual rated capacity of more than 119 gallons and an aggregate rated capacity of 1,000 gallons or more that is either permanently or temporarily attached to the vehicle or the chassis. A commercial motor vehicle transporting an empty storage container tank, not designed for transportation, with a rated capacity of 1,000 gallons or more that is temporarily attached to a flatbed trailer is not considered a tank vehicle.

Implication1: A shipment of IBC’s that individually have a capacity of more than 119 gallons and a total capacity of greater than 1000 gallons is now considered an Tank Vehicle, even if it’s in a van.

Implication2: The driver will now need a tank endorsement on their CDL (Commercial Drivers License)

Best Safety and Compliance Practise: Ensure that if you are shipping IBC’s to/from the US on a shipment that meets the definition of a Tank Vehicle, that the driver picking up the shipment has a Tank Endorsement on his CDL, much like shippers are verifying the Hazmat Endorsement and FAST card requirement for Hazmat Shipments.

Posted in Best Practises, Chemical Transportation, New FMCSA Regulations | Tagged | Comments Off

5 Incredible Things You Probably Didn’t Know About Carrier Fraud

 1.  It’s easy!

A fraudulent carrier just has to show up at your dock and say, “hey, I’m here to pick up that load going to Texas”. If you don’t have controls in place, he gets loaded, drives away and you never see him again. You’re shipment is stolen and there’s very little you can do about it. Many shippers don’t understand the potential for fraud and their shipping/receiving departments are not properly trained to understand the potential.

2.  It’s not illegal!

A smart fraudster can set up a scam so that it’s not even illegal. Here’s how. A fraudulent party will buy a bankrupt carrier for peanuts. Then, go out and solicit to pick up freight. Let’s say you normally pay $1800 from Chicago to Toronto.

The fraudster calls you and says,
“hey, I really need to get my truck home, I’ll do it for the cost of fuel, how’s $1000 bucks sound?”
You think, “Great, what a deal!”.

The fraudster then faxes you over a license and authorities that have been active for years and they check out. He sends you an insurance certificate that looks good. Everything checks out. You give him the load. So now the fraudster goes to work. He contracts with another carrier to move your load for $2000, which he has no problem doing since the going rate is $1800.

You might be thinking, how does this make sense?
Just wait.

Once the load is picked up and delivered and you’re very happy with your $1000 dollar shipment, the fraudster calls and says,

“Hey, do you guys offer a discount for quick payment?”
“Sure, you say, 5% discount if we pay early.”
“Wow this just keeps getting better!” your thinking.

So you pay the guy $950 bucks. I mean, you have a valid proof of delivery and you can verify everything went smoothly, right? Now here’s where you get stung. 30-60 days later, the carrier that actually moved your shipment comes looking for money. The other guy closed up shop and is long gone. You end up in a really messy situation and may have to pay the other carrier’s freight bill to boot! How is this not illegal? Surprisingly, it’s not. You contracted with the guy to perform a service, he did and you paid him. As long as, he performs work under the contract, it’s not fraud (by definition) it’s a civil matter and you have to sue to get your money back. Good luck!

3.  The Police won’t help you.

Because the scenario doesn’t meet the legal definition of fraud, the police tell you it’s a civil matter and not their problem. When this happened to me once, I was told, it’s my own fault for doing business with the guy. I guess it was, it just hurt to be told so.

4.  It’s very profitable!

Let’s say our fraudster has 2-3 loads a day on the go. Pretty easy for someone to manage. Typically, they don’t go for $1000 loads either. They pick a really good paying one. Toronto to California, or Georgia to Vancouver. Full loads, long miles. They could fetch $5000 – $6000 per transaction x 3 per day x 45 days (before anyone comes looking for money) = about $500,000 for a month and a half’s work. All in cash! 100% profit. No overhead. Sometimes I think, wow! What a great business. It’s totally legal and profitable! As long as you hide the money away and have no assets, no one will bother suing you to get it back. Heck, now a day’s you can even do it from another country with a local Skype number. No one will know the wiser.

5.  It’s super easy to prevent!

The above scenarios are easy to prevent with a little bit of diligence. Listed below are some best practices aimed at reducing the potential for theft and fraud related to transportation

1.  Have a system to give unique pick up and delivery numbers to every shipment. Give this number only to an authorized representative of the transportation company you are dealing with. If a driver does not present a valid number, you shouldn’t load him or unload him.

2.  Know who you are doing business with:

  • Check insurance policies are valid by calling the carriers agent to verify
  • Check online resources like the FMCSA to confirm the carrier is authorized to move freight and has a valid license to do so.
  • Check the phone numbers on the website vs. FMCSA vs. the guy you’re talking to. This will prevent someone posing as a “real” carrier from calling you to solicit freight, only to steal it.
  • Google the carrier’s address. A trucking company is pretty obvious from Google on satellite. If the carrier’s address turns out to be a strip mall, PO box, or a residential area, you may want to ask a few more questions.
  • Call the carrier from the number on their website. Ask for the person you are talking to. This confirms they work there and are a valid representative of the company you think you are speaking with.
  • Ask for references of other customers, and call them! Make sure the references given haven’t just started doing business a couple of weeks ago. This should be a red flag. You’re looking for longtime customers.
  • Do a credit check. Do you really want to give $100,000 worth of your product to someone on the verge of bankruptcy. Probably not. Check! It’s important. Plus, how likely do you think a carrier on the verge or bankruptcy is going to be to pay a claim.
  • Google the carrier. You’d be surprised what you might find out. There are lots of blogs and complaint websites about fraudulent carriers. They may have already committed fraud somewhere else.
  • Develop an in-house “do not use list”. If you’ve disqualified someone once. Don’t give them the opportunity to try and fool you again. Keep a list.

Hopefully, this will help keep the industry safe and clean for everyone. If everyone is a little more diligent we can prevent bad things from happening. If I had one more piece of advice to offer it would be to be extra diligent on that 4pm on a Friday afternoon rush emergency shipment. The fraudsters wait for these. They know when time is of the essence that all the checks and balances sometimes get thrown out the window. Don’t let it happen to you.

Posted in Best Practises, Chemical Transportation, Industry Information | Tagged , , , | Comments Off

$1340 Dollars Raised for the You Be The Chemist Drive

DSN Chemical Transportation is happy to announce that for the first month of our fund raising drive for the You Be The Chemist program, $1340 dollars have been raised.

DSN committed to donate $10 per shipment made by every CACD member between November 1, 2011 and January 31, 2012. Further details can be fount at:

You Be the Chemist Fund Raising Drive

The 134 shipments made under the program came from 8 different CACD members.

We thank the membership for their support of the program. Our goal is to raise over $5000 for the YBTC campaign. Keep those shipments coming!

Posted in Chemical Transportation | Leave a comment

How a Little Bit of Diligence in Carrier Selection Can Avoid Some Serious Problems.

By Paul Stevens, General Manager
DSN Chemical Transportation
www.chemicaltransportation.com

C.H. ROBINSON
$23,700,000
(Sperl et.al. v. C.H. Robinson)

C.H. ROBINSON
$23,750,000
(Schramm v. Foster)

Browning-Ferris
$719,237
(Puckrein v. ATI Transport)


The three cases listed above set some serious precedents in relation to how you manage your carriers and how you should qualify the safety of the carriers moving your freight. If you want to read the cases in more detail, please Google them to find a more in depth explanation of each individual case.

My objective today is to convince you that carrier selection and management has some serious implications for your business and you need to take it seriously. I know with budget cuts and downsizing, many companies like yours have done away with the traditional transportation manager position and have re-assigned this workload to purchasing, or pushed it down to customer service. In these scenarios you have people unfamiliar and inexperienced in the trucking industry buying freight services. Buying freight services is not like buying office supplies! There are many contractual and safety issues to consider before engaging the services of a transportation provider.

General Liability Insurance:
There are statutory minimum levels of insurance required by your carriers. In Puckrein v. ATI Transport, the shipper did not ensure the carrier had the proper insurance and was ordered to pay damages to victims of a traffic accident. It’s critical to have a system in place to monitor and verify that your carriers have valid insurance in place. You can do this by obtaining a certificate of insurance from their insurance company.

Cargo Insurance
Did you know that freight picking up in the US is covered under US law, more specifically, the Carmack Amendment? This means that it rides at full value and the carrier is liable for full value in the event of a claim. However, read your fine print! Many carriers can, and do offer you pricing discounts in exchange for limited liability. I’ve seen some as low as 10 cents a pound. Be careful make sure you ask the question, especially with high value freight.

Did you know your carrier has no liability if your freight is damaged by: Act of God, Act of Civil Authority, Inherent Vice in the Goods (ie: insufficient packaging), or act or omission on behalf of the shipper (like loading it properly). You should have insurance that covers your goods in transit and specific situations where your carrier is not liable.

Did you know that freight originating in Canada has a maximum carrier liability of $2.00 per pound? If you declare more, you will be charged a fee, if you don’t declare a value $2.00 per pound is all you’ll get in the event of a claim.

It’s good practice not to be named as an “additional insured” on a cargo policy. You may limit your right to file a claim under the policy. You can’t file a claim against yourself!

Does your transportation broker have Errors and Omissions Insurance? They should! In a case where your broker “forgot” to tell the carrier to heat a freezable shipment in the winter, the carrier would be off the hook because they were not contracted for heat. The broker would have to take on the liability of a cargo claim in this situation. You need to ensure they have coverage.

How much is the deductible? Your transportation provider may be reluctant to pay a sizable claim if it’s under their deductible on the policy.

Workers Compensation
If you’re contracting with Ontario based carriers, you should have a WSIB clearance certificate on file for the carrier or transportation provider you’ve contracted with. If your subcontractor is not in good standing with the WSIB, you could be liable for their WSIB premiums as a percentage of the contract cost you paid them. This is scary! They can go back years. Make sure you have a WSIB certificate on file for any transportation provider based in Ontario that you do business with.

Cargo Theft
There are more and more cases of identity theft in the transportation industry. A typical scheme is where a “thief” poses as a legitimate carrier and then gets all the credentials to pick up a shipment. The thief carrier goes in and picks up a shipment, never to be heard from again. You can reduce the risk of this by doing your homework and checking insurance certificates, the carriers website and real phone number, check with the FMCSA to make sure the carrier has an active operating authority, and if the rate seems to good to be true, it probably is.

Safety
In the Schramm v. Foster case, the central issue was the safety rating of the carrier involved in an accident. You should be checking SAFERSYS to make sure your carriers have a SATISFACTORY safety rating. This is easily done on line and should be monitored regularly, because it can change. If you are using carriers with CONDITIONAL or UNSATISFACTORY safety ratings you could be putting your company at risk in the event the carrier gets in an accident where there are injuries or death.

In addition to SAFERSYS, there is a new safety rating program that started in late December 2010. It’s called CSA – Compliance, Safety, Accountability . It’s a safety ranking system that ranks a carrier on seven BASIC’s Each BASIC is a safety related category that ranks the number of violations and warnings for the carrier against all carriers in the industry. There is a threshold value for each one. Once exceeded, it opens the carrier up to greater inspections and interventions by the FMCSA. In the context of due diligence you should know if your carriers have any safety alerts (above the threshold value) in any safety categories. This is a great program, but it puts more onus on shippers to check up on the carriers they are contracting with.

Conclusion
Contracting with a carrier or transportation provider is serious business. It’s not like sending a package by FedEx! There are complicated rules and regulations that govern transportation contracts as well as, a history of common law practice. Most of the time, if nothing goes wrong, no one notices. In the event of a chemical spill, an accident, a cargo claim, or cargo theft, everyone goes looking for someone to blame. Don’t let that person be you. Make sure you have a tight policy on carrier selection and qualification and make sure you have clearly defined who can approve new transportation providers.

A little due diligence comes in handy when the worst happens.

If you would like a free review of your carrier selection program, please contact the author at:

paul.stevens@chemicaltransportation.com

Posted in Best Practises, Chemical Transportation, Industry Information | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

DSN Chemical Transportation Beefing Up Their Chemical Expertise

DSN Chemical Transportation has been focusing and concentrating their expertise in the Chemical Sector for years.  In keeping with a focused chemical niche logistics provider strategy, DSN Chemical Transportation has added an experienced Chemical Engineer to thier sales staff.

DSN would like to introduce Mr. Andrew Gaspar:

  Andrew Gaspar, B.A.Sc.with DSN CHEMICAL TRANSPORTATION, is a chemical engineer with 30 plus years senior level experience in business development and major project development across a wide spectrum of client industries including chemicals, oil and gas, petrochemicals, power generation, renewable energy, and manufacturing. Andrew’s experience encompasses Canadian market entry and new product launches with a leading global chemicals company, ground braking energy regulatory interventions at the OEB (Ontario), and developing power project in the $200 – $500MM range in North America and Asia as well as extensive sales and business development in the industrial gas, cryogenics, and air separation plant business.

Until recently he has been applying his broad business experience and wide industry exposure to the recruitment of senior engineers and project managers in the Chemical Process industries, Power Generation and Renewable Energy fields, following an assignment as Vice President Business Development with a Toronto based Marketing Services firm.

HIGHLIGHTS OF QUALIFICATIONS:

30+ years technical business and project development, sales management and marketing experience in chemicals, power generation, natural gas, and industrial gas, including due diligence for projects of up to $500 MM.
Market entry business development experience with a Fortune 500 company
Proven ability to rapidly master complex technical and financial details
Expertise in financial and regulatory analysis of major energy capital projects
A passionate and driven high level business developer, with strong business acumen.
An articulate, analytical and creative strategist with a knack for relationship building.

DSN Chemical Transportation would like to welcome Andrew aboard.  We will be leveraging his expertise for the benefit of our customers.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

How Rising Fuel Prices Affect Logistics

Infographics from Software Advice, a site review TMS systems.Click here for their website.

Posted in Industry Information, Uncategorized | Comments Off

What You Need to do Because FMCSA Ended BMC-32 Cargo Insurance Requirements for Carriers

On March 21, the FMCSA eliminated the mandatory BMC-32 cargo insurance covering for-hire motor carriers and freight forwarders that do not transport household goods.

The BMC-32, written during the tenure of the defunct Interstate Commerce Commission, was a hedge against the financial troubles many trucking companies got into as a result of the intense competition brought on by deregulation. The question facing shippers is how they protect themselves and their customers from potential financial losses from damaged cargo caused by underinsured carriers.

The elimination of BMC-32 will affect about 94,000 common carriers and freight forwarders. They will no longer be required to prove that their cargo insurance meets Federal minimums. By the way, the mandate never covered other carriers, including contract fleets; hence, they are unaffected by this change.

In explaining its rationale, the agency noted that for-hire carriers “typically have cargo insurance well above FMCSA limits, because their shipper clients generally require it as a condition of doing business.”

With the removal of the mandatory coverage, some shippers may miss certain special features of the BMC-32 endorsement. These include: protection for loss and damage claims with no deductibles or exclusions; as well as the option for direct action against the insurer in the case of carrier insolvency or bankruptcy. When the rulemaking takes effect, shippers only remaining protection is the carrier’s usual cargo insurance policy.

As of March 21, all BMC-32 endorsements will expire, but FMCSA will retain key policy details on its web site through March 18, 2013. This will help plaintiffs to identify coverage for claims arising from transportation that occurred while the policies were still in effect.

What this means for you:

With the termination of the BMC-32 requirement, shippers must verify a carrier’s cargo insurance independent of FMCSA sources, as part of their carrier qualification process. As the FMCSA noted in its rulemaking: “elimination of the BMC-32 endorsement will make it less convenient to confirm the existence of cargo insurance.”

For the next two years, the FMCSA will continue to be a source, for research purposes only. FMCSA can identify the carrier’s insurance company and policy numbers but -as is the case today – this data does not include specific details on policy limits, deductibles or the existence of additional insurance to cover contingencies such as reefer equipment failure.

With the elimination of the BMC-32 insurance requirement, shippers must now adapt their carrier qualifications to include a new source for verifying carriers insurance.

Best Practice:

Here at DSN Chemical Transportation we’ve always collected insurance certificates from all our approved carriers. We have a system to track insurance limits and expiry. Our system automatically “unapproves” carriers when the insurance we have on file expires, preventing us from dispatching a shipment to them and promting us to follow up and verify the renewal.

Posted in Best Practises, Chemical Transportation, New FMCSA Regulations | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off

The Harsh Mathematics of Diesel Fuel are Adding Up Again

I often hear in the marketplace many shippers making comments in regard to fuel surcharges and saying things like, “the fuel surcharge is a license to print money!”, “I just want to pay the fuel, not buy the truck!”, “those carriers are making a killing on fuel surcharge!” I can understand their frustration. The fuel is on the rise again and the current price of fuel is hurting everyone’s business and killing our purchasing power. Every time we fill o

Diesel Fuel Prices

ur family car with gas it seems to cost more every week. While there may be some carriers who choose to take advantage of bad situation, the overwhelming majority of carriers are hurting from the high cost of fuel just like you are. Even more so, fuel is one of the biggest single input costs for a carrier.

From personal experience, I know you just can’t re-negotiate the fuel surcharge with your customers fast enough to keep up with the rising prices of fuel. The driver pays for fuel increases immediately on the highway, by the time the end customer sees a fuel surcharge adjustment, weeks worth of fuel have been put into the truck. Here is some simple math to help you understand negotiate with your carriers fairly on fuel surcharge and to understand where they are coming from when they want to re-negotiate your fuel surcharge.

What is the cost of fuel today? $3.43 US per gallon

How much fuel does the average truck use per mile? 6 miles per gallon

How much does fuel cost a truck use per mile = $3.43/6 = 57.1 cents per mile.

To put things in perspective February 2009 fuel was $2.04 per gallon or 40 cents per mile. It has gone up 43% in 2 years!

Example:

Lets look at a shipment from Chicago to Toronto. Chicago to Toronto is just shy of 500 miles (if you want to know the mileage of any points you can try Mapquest or Google Earth.) Just the cost of fuel on a truckload shipment from Chicago to Toronto is $285 dollars. Now lets say the carrier has to drive 50 miles empty from his last pick to pick up your shipment. That’s another $28. Now lets say he has to drive 50 miles empty back to his terminal after he delivers at your facility, that’s another $28. Our cost of fuel on this shipment is now $341 for the average carrier based on the average cost per gallon in the US. Please keep in mind some carriers may have even driven empty from Toronto to get a load in Chicago (this is happening more and more). If you’re shipping to/from the West, fuel is $3.53/gallon = 58.8 cents per mile!

Also, at the end of the day, the carrier has laid out $341 dollars in input costs. In your business, if you had laid out $341 wouldn’t you want a return on investment as well? So do the carriers. They are a for-profit business. Expect fuel surcharges in excess of 57 cents per mile. How much margin is fair? Well, that’s for you and the carrier to negotiate.

Hopefully this has given you an understanding of how fuel costs impact truckload rates and a basis on which to negotiate with your carriers for a fair and equitable fuel surcharge.

Posted in Best Practises, Industry Information | Comments Off

Bulletin: CSA 2010 Now Live On-Line

As of December 13, 2010 the CSA 2010 data is on line at: http://ai.fmcsa.dot.gov/sms/

CSA 2010 carrier recordWhat the CSA 2010 carrier record looks like

If you’re a chemical shipper, or any shipper for that matter, hazardous or not, you should be looking at the new data to evaluate your hazmat and chemical carriers for safety. You will find that each carrier is rated on 6 BASICS.

  1. Unsafe Driving
  2. Fatigued Driving
  3. Driver Fitness
  4. Controlled Substances and Alcohol
  5. Vehicle maintenance
  6. Cargo Related

The BASICS are then used to calculate a Crash Indicator. This is the statistical likelihood that a carrier will be involved in a crash. I explain the process in more detail in a past blog article here.

What you want to look for is a carrier who is deficient in one of the BASICS. The way the rating system works is a percentile rank off all the carriers in the system. For example, a carrier with an unsafe driving score of 30% means that 30% of carriers have a better ranking and 70% have a worse ranking. To be deficient in a BASIC you have to have a percentile rank above the minimum threshold.

These values are listed below.

Intervention Thresholds by Motor Carrier Type
Basic General Hazmat Carrier Passenger Carrier
Unsafe Driving ≥65% ≥60% ≥50%
Fatigued Driving (Hours-of-Service) 65% 60% 50%
Driver Fitness 80% 75% 65%
Controlled Substances and Alcohol 80% 75% 65%
Vehicle Maintenance 80% 75% 65%
Cargo-Related 80% 75% 65%
Crash Indicator 65% 60% 50%

At DSN Chemical Transportation we will be evaluating the available data and data quality provided by the FMCSA to incorporate this new information in our hazmat and chemical carrier selection and qualification process.

For further information you can contact DSN Chemical Transportation at 1-800-388-3487

Posted in Best Practises, Chemical Transportation, New FMCSA Regulations | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off